Seasonal variation in the occurrence of stroke in Northern Greece: a 10 year study in 8204 patients.

OBJECTIVE: The effect of seasonal variation on the occurrence of stroke remains controversial. The objective of this study was to determine whether there is a seasonal variation in the occurrence of stroke in Northern Greece. METHODS: We recorded the seasonal stroke rates over a 10 year period (from January 1997 to December 2006) in 8204 patients in Northern Greece. The findings were analysed separately for ischemic stroke (IS), intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) and transient ischemic attack (TIA). RESULTS: In patients with IS, there was a significant seasonal variation (p<0.001), with the peak incidence in spring (8.4% above average) and the lowest rate in summer (10.4% below average). There was no significant seasonal variation in the occurrence of the other stroke subtypes (ICH, SAH and TIA) when they were considered individually. DISCUSSION: The seasonal effect on stroke incidence needs to be defined so as to improve the provision of preventive measures.

Adrenal incidentaloma: a diagnostic challenge.

The widespread application of abdominal imaging procedures has resulted in an increased frequency of clinically silent adrenal masses. Adrenal incidentaloma (AI) is a term applied to an accidentally discovered adrenal mass on imaging performed for the investigation of an unrelated complaint. Adrenal incidentalomas (AIs) are a cluster of different pathologies, the majority of which are benign and non-functioning adrenal adenomas. However, mild hormonal alterations as well as metabolic abnormalities may be present in patients with AIs. Thus, a multidisciplinary approach with biochemical and radiologic evaluation is needed to characterize these lesions and identify patients who are at high risk for hormonal or malignant evolution. Significant new information has helped resolve controversies regarding the most reliable approach to this clinical problem. The present review considers the prevalence, pathology and natural history of AIs. We also discuss the reliability of available screening methods and localization techniques and consider optimal management and follow-up strategies.

The role of statins for the primary and secondary prevention of coronary heart disease in women.

Coronary heart disease (CHD) is the leading cause of death in the developed world in both men and women. Elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels are strong and independent vascular risk factors in both genders. Statins effectively decrease LDL-C levels, reduce vascular morbidity and mortality and are an essential component of CHD preventive strategies. However, women are less likely to be prescribed statins than men in both primary and secondary prevention settings. It was argued that there is no conclusive evidence showing that statins are beneficial for the prevention of vascular disease in women, particularly in those without established CHD. This review summarizes the evidence regarding the effects of statins in the prevention of CHD in women. Accumulating data suggest that statins are equally effective in both men and women. The lack of significant effects in some studies appears to be primarily due to the under-representation of women and the ensuing lack of statistical power. Current guidelines for the prevention of vascular disease also recommend a similar management of dyslipidemia in both men and women. Therefore, statin treatment should be implemented with the same criteria and with the same goals in both genders.

Pleiotropic effects of statins--clinical evidence.

The present review considers the potential pleiotropic effects of statins and the evidence indicative of the "real world" benefit from these effects in patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD). Some of these cholesterol-independent effects of statins involve improved endothelial function, stability of atherosclerotic plaques, attenuation of oxidative stress and inflammation, as well as inhibition of the thrombogenic response. Clinical evidence from early statin administration in acute coronary syndromes and in revascularisation procedures is reported. Moreover, the "metabolic" effects of statin treatment, such as renal function improvement and reduction in serum uric acid levels, in patients with stable coronary heart disease are discussed. Evidence suggests that in high CVD risk patient groups pleiotropic effects of statins may play a role in the reduction of morbidity and mortality. However, this concept requires proof in appropriately designed trials that will include clinically relevant end points in order to set specific targets in new CVD-related biomarkers, in addition to lipid levels, that should be used to fully assess the statin contribution to CVD treatment.

Cardiorenal anemia syndrome: do erythropoietin and iron therapy have a place in the treatment of heart failure?

The cardiorenal anemia syndrome in congestive heart failure (CHF) is an independent risk factor for vascular morbidity and mortality. Several factors play a role in the pathogenesis of anemia in CHF, including inflammation, impaired renal function, use of certain antihypertensive or cardioprotective agents, and gastrointestinal or urinary losses of essential hemopoietic factors. Several trials evaluated the effects of administering erythropoietin (EPO) and/or iron to patients with CHF. Even though most of them were uncontrolled studies, their results suggest that EPO treatment might be beneficial in CHF. Nevertheless, more studies are needed and certain issues should be resolved, particularly the optimal hemoglobin level, before EPO can become part of the treatment of patients with CHF.

Medical treatment as an alternative to adrenalectomy in patients with aldosterone-producing adenomas.

Primary aldosteronism (PA) and, in particular, its two commonest subtypes (i.e. idiopathic hyperaldosteronism (IHA) and aldosterone-producing adenoma (APA)) have been recognized as the most common cause of secondary hypertension. While 'conservative' medical treatment with aldosterone receptor antagonists is the therapeutic approach of choice in controlling blood pressure in patients with PA due to IHA, the more invasive (laparoscopic) adrenalectomy seems to be the most suitable therapy for patients with APA. In this review, we focus on the medical approach for the management of APA in cases where surgical excision of the adrenal is not possible.

Primary and secondary coronary heart disease prevention using statins: is targeting Adam or Eve equally effective?

Women differ from men in terms of their cardiovascular disease risk. The existing data suggest that primary cardiovascular disease prevention treatment with a statin could be cost effective for women and men with a high cardiovascular disease risk. In secondary cardiovascular disease prevention both men and women seem to benefit equally from statin treatment. However, the relatively small number of women included in several statin trials has limited the evidence available. With regard to the question of whether Eve is becoming Adam, the answer is not yet: we need more evidence!

Antisense technology for the prevention or the treatment of cardiovascular disease: the next blockbuster?

Antisense technology might be a gateway to the treatment of diseases by targeting the expression of genes rather than permanently altering them. Thus, there will be fewer ethical concerns. Antisense oligonucleotides (ASO) can alter target gene expression by binding to RNA. Once bound, the ASO either disables or induces the degradation of the target RNA. This technology may be used to treat various conditions (including cancer, diabetes, and hypertension, as well as autoimmune and cardiovascular diseases). ASOs are potentially potent, selective and well-tolerated drugs. Mipomersen (ISIS 301012) inhibits human apolipoprotein (apo)B-100 synthesis and lowers circulating apoB and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels. ASO technology may provide a spectrum of agents targeting other vascular risk factors or mediators of atherosclerosis.

Statins for the prevention of first or recurrent stroke.

This review considers the evidence showing that statins can prevent first or recurrent stroke or improve its outcome in subjects at moderate or high risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD). Data are reviewed according to trial design (observational or prospective) and baseline CVD risk. Two (ASCOT, CARDS) out of five primary CVD prevention statin trials showed a considerable reduction in stroke rates. In two (MIRACL and PROVE IT) out of five acute coronary syndrome trials, the prevention of first stroke was significant. Most secondary prevention trials (4S, CARE, LIPID, HPS, GREACE and TNT) showed a beneficial effect of statins in stroke prevention. Finally, SPARCL, the only secondary stroke prevention trial in subjects without overt coronary heart disease (CHD), showed a significant reduction in total and ischaemic (fatal and nonfatal) stroke rate, although a small but significant increase in nonfatal haemorrhagic stroke was noted. There was also a significant reduction in CHD-related events. The possible mechanisms responsible for statin-associated stroke prevention are discussed. The evidence suggests the need to consider early and long-term statin treatment (with substantial low-density lipoprotein cholesterol reduction) in all patients at high risk of any type of major vascular event, without discriminating CHD from stroke. Thus, statins may be beneficial to both the heart and the brain.

Do we need to consider inflammatory markers when we treat atherosclerotic disease?

This review considers the value of monitoring inflammatory markers as a guide to selecting appropriate drugs in patients at high risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Clinical and experimental studies investigated inflammation in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS), stable coronary artery disease (CAD) and diabetes mellitus (DM) or metabolic syndrome (MetS), non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) or systemic autoimmune diseases (SAD). Evidence suggests that in these high risk groups inflammation plays a role in the extent and severity of atherosclerosis. Simple inflammatory markers (e.g. C-reactive protein and fibrinogen) can be monitored cost effectively and may influence the selection of drugs that can normalize both traditional CVD risk factors and inflammation. However, this concept requires proof in appropriately designed trials that include clinically relevant end points.

Effects of statin treatment in men and women with stable coronary heart disease: a subgroup analysis of the GREACE Study.

BACKGROUND: Reducing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels to National Cholesterol Expert Panel (NCEP) goal is recommended. However, sex-specific effects may influence benefit. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this post hoc analysis of the GREek Atorvastatin and Coronary heart disease (CHD) Evaluation [GREACE] study we investigated the extent in vascular event reduction by statin treatment according to sex. From a total of 1600 patients with stable CHD, 624/176 and 632/168 were men/women on atorvastatin or on usual care, respectively. During 3-year follow-up, comparison of atorvastatin treatment with usual care demonstrated a relative risk reduction (RRR) of the primary end point (all vascular events) of 54% in women (hazard ratio [HR] 0.46, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.24-0.87, p=0.003) and of 50% in men (HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.32-0.70, p<0.001). The fall in LDL-C levels played the key role in end point reduction in both sexes. However, in men there was an additional benefit related to the atorvastatin-induced increase in high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), while in women end points were related to a substantial triglycerides (TG) reduction. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with atorvastatin to the NCEP LDL-C goal compared with 'usual care' significantly reduced CHD morbidity and mortality in both men and women. Both men and women benefited from statin treatment possibly with different mechanisms making a contribution over and above LDL-C reduction.

Spironolactone versus eplerenone for the treatment of idiopathic hyperaldosteronism.

The aim of this prospective, randomised, open-label, blinded-end point study was to compare the efficacy and safety of eplerenone versus spironolactone in patients with bilateral idiopathic hyperaldosteronism (IHA). After a 2-week washout period, 34 patients with IHA were assigned to receive either spironolactone 25 mg b.i.d. (n = 17) or eplerenone 25 mg b.i.d. (n = 17) for 24 weeks. If the patients' blood pressure (BP) was not < 140/90 mmHg, the doses were gradually increased up to 400 mg for spironolactone and 200 mg for eplerenone. If the patients' BP remained uncontrolled, a daily dose of hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg was added at week 16. The primary outcome was the percentage of patients with BP < 140/90 mmHg at 16 weeks (i.e., with aldosterone antagonist monotherapy). The patients' BP was normalised in 13 out of 17 (76.5%) and 14 out of 17 (82.4%) patients in the spironolactone and eplerenone groups, respectively (p = 1.00). Systolic BP decreased more rapidly with eplerenone. Serum potassium levels were normalised (> 3.5 mmol/l) in all patients at 4 weeks. Mild hyperkalaemia was observed in two patients receiving 400 mg of spironolactone and in three patients receiving 150 mg of eplerenone. Two patients presented with bilateral painful gynaecomastia at the end of week 16 while receiving 400 mg of spironolactone. Switching spironolactone to 150 mg of eplerenone daily resulted in resolution of gynaecomastia and also maintained BP control. At the end of the study, 19 patients were on eplerenone and 15 were on spironolactone. However, this did not affect the primary end point, because the switch from spironolactone to eplerenone (in two patients) occurred at the end of week 16. It was concluded that eplerenone was as effective as spironolactone in reducing BP in patients with IHA. The risk of mild hyperkalaemia was similar with both drugs.

Effectiveness of ezetimibe alone or in combination with twice a week Atorvastatin (10 mg) for statin intolerant high-risk patients.

This study was undertaken to investigate the effect of ezetimibe (10 mg/day) alone or in combination with atorvastatin (10 mg twice a week) on hypercholesterolemia in 56 high-risk patients intolerant to daily statin use. Ezetimibe monotherapy was well tolerated (2 withdrawals) and induced a mean reduction in low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol of 20% (p <0.05) at the third month. However, of the 54 patients still taking ezetimibe, only 5 (9%) were at their LDL cholesterol targets. Atorvastatin 10 mg twice a week was then added to ezetimibe and was well tolerated (3 withdrawals). This combination reduced LDL cholesterol (in a treatment-based analysis) by 37% compared with baseline (p <0.001), with 43 (84%) patients reaching their LDL cholesterol goals. When patients (n = 34, 25 men) with baseline serum creatinine values in the upper 2 tertiles were analyzed separately, there was a significant (p = 0.041) decrease in serum creatinine levels after 6 months of treatment. In conclusion, the combination of ezetimibe plus atorvastatin 10 mg twice a week might be a therapeutic option for high-risk patients intolerant to daily statin monotherapy.

Do we need a statin-nicotinic acid-aspirin mini-polypill to treat combined hyperlipidaemia?

This review considers the treatment for combined hyperlipidaemia (CH) with a combination formulation of three drugs: a statin, nicotinic acid (NA) and aspirin--a mini-polypill. CH is a highly atherogenic dyslipidaemia manifested either as familial combined hyperlipidaemia or dyslipidaemia related to the metabolic syndrome or Type 2 diabetes mellitus. These types of dyslipidaemia are highly prevalent in the general population. Statin plus extended-release NA is a promising treatment option for the normalisation of these atherogenic lipid alterations, regression of atherosclerosis, as well as for primary or secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD) events. The addition of aspirin might prove a useful adjunct that might reduce the cutaneous side effects of NA while also acting as an antiplatelet agent in high-CVD-risk patients. However, the effective dose of aspirin may need to be at least 160 mg/day. This triple combination might improve patient compliance when compared with the three drugs administered separately.

Atorvastatin decreases triacylglycerol-associated risk of vascular events in coronary heart disease patients.

High triacylglycerol (TAG) levels may predict vascular risk. The effect of a statin-induced reduction in TAG levels, irrespective of HDL-C increase, on clinical outcome has not yet been addressed by an endpoint study in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD). The GREACE study compared usual with structured care aimed at achieving LDL-C = 100 mg/dL (2.6 mmol/L) by dose titration with atorvastatin. All patients had CHD and were followed for 3 years. This post hoc analysis of GREACE examines the effect of statins on TAG levels and their relation with cardiovascular disease (CVD) events in all patients and in the subgroup of patients with metabolic syndrome (MetS). Baseline TAG levels >150 mg/dL (1.7 mmol/L) were predictive of subsequent CVD events [cardiac mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), unstable angina (UA), revascularisation, congestive heart failure (CHF), and stroke] only in statin untreated patients. Stepwise regression analysis showed that with every 20% statin-related TAG reduction there was a decrease in CVD risk by 12% (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.75-0.95, P = 0.007) in the structured care group vs. the usual care group, by 8% (HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.81-0.97, P = 0.02) in all statin treated patients vs. the untreated ones and by 15% (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.65-0.94, P = 0.005) in those with MetS treated with a statin vs. those untreated. Using the same analysis but only taking into consideration vascular events (cardiac mortality, non-fatal MI, UA, revascularisation, and stroke) there was a 18% (HR = 0.82, 95% CI 0.57-0.96, P = 0.03) decrease in risk in the MetS (+) patients treated with a statin vs. those not on a statin, and a decrease in risk by 16% (HR = 0.84, 95% CI 0.53-1.07, P = 0.08), when only hard vascular endpoints (cardiac mortality, non-fatal MI, and stroke) were considered. TAG levels are predictive of subsequent CVD events in statin untreated CHD patients. Statin (mainly atorvastatin)-induced decrease in TAG levels was related to a significant reduction in subsequent CVD events. This benefit was more pronounced in CHD MetS (+) patients.

Statins exert multiple beneficial effects on patients undergoing percutaneous revascularization procedures.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Statins are an essential component of the therapeutic approach of patients with atherosclerotic disease. Statin use is also associated with improved peri-operative and long-term outcomes in these patients. We aimed to define the role of statin treatment in patients undergoing percutaneous revascularization procedures. LITERATURE SEARCH METHOD: We searched Medline for studies assessing the effect of statin treatment on percutaneous interventions. LITERATURE SEARCH RESULTS: Early statin treatment is associated with improved outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention procedures. Current evidence implies that statin treatment may also play a beneficial role in the management of patients undergoing percutaneous renal artery revascularization and endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, carotid angioplasty/stenting and endovascular peripheral arterial interventions. CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary data suggest that statins exert multiple beneficial actions in patients undergoing percutaneous interventions. Future randomized trials are expected to further evaluate the beneficial effects of statins in these procedures.